She pulled up her pipeline on the screen during our first call and said: I have 47 leads in here.
I said: how many are moving?
She went quiet.
I’ve heard that silence dozens of times. It means they already know the answer — they just haven’t said it out loud yet.
I always ask the same follow-up: what’s that costing you?
Most of the time, they haven’t done that math. So we do it together.
The staff time you’re not counting
Here’s what I usually find when I dig in. Someone on the team has a sticky note, a spreadsheet, or a Notes app where they track what Lawmatics should be tracking automatically. Not because they’re bad at their job. Because the system left a gap and someone filled it.
That gap has a cost. For most firms I work with, it runs five to fifteen hours a week across the team.
At $25 an hour, that’s up to $78,000 a year in staff time spent compensating for a system that should be doing it automatically.
That number gets people. The next one gets them more.
The leads you’re not converting
The first firm to respond wins the consultation. Not the best firm. The fastest one.
Most firms I audit don’t have an automated immediate response in place. They have someone who checks notifications when they get to their desk. Or when they remember. Or when a lead that came in Tuesday finally gets a reply on Thursday.
That’s not a staffing problem. That’s a system design problem.
Two additional conversions per month at an average matter value of $3,500 is $84,000 a year.
Not from a broken system — from a slow one.
What it costs the attorney
And then there’s the attorney.
When the system doesn’t hold things together, the attorney does. They’re the ones who remember to follow up. Who notice the automation didn’t fire. Who catch what slipped through. I had one client describe her week to me and I counted eleven separate moments where she manually caught something the system missed. Eleven times she stepped in where automation should have.
That’s not resilience. That’s a system relying on the wrong person to be reliable.
Why firms wait — and what that actually costs
The part that stays with me: most firms already know something’s wrong.
They’ve known for six months. Some for over a year. The fix keeps getting pushed because there’s always something more urgent. And meanwhile, the cost keeps running. Every week. On every lead that slips. On every hour the team spends doing manually what the system should do automatically.
The cost of waiting doesn’t pause while you’re deciding.
The audit exists because I needed a way to show firms exactly where they’re losing — not in theory, but in their specific workflows. Not every firm needs a full rebuild. Some need two or three targeted fixes and they’re done. But every firm that’s done this math with me found the number higher than they thought.
If your firm is evaluating a Lawmatics implementation or recovering from one that didn’t go well, book a consultation to talk about what’s possible.
Book a consultation
What’s the workaround your team uses most to compensate for something Lawmatics should be doing automatically? I read every reply.
